What is the difference between dracula and nosferatu

One can imagine, I guess, how much of a bummer that would be. Draculas might be a dime a dozen at this point, and you may think the whole bloodsucking business is old hat. Which, in a way, it is!

Tyler Coates is a writer who lives in Los Angeles. Where to stream Bram Stoker's Dracula. The Count in this movie, although pale, is more humanistic and regal looking, and adorned in a blood red robe. He speaks eloquently and with a thick Romanian accent. The rest of the castle, however, looks like a traditional stone castle. Through the rest of the film Jonathan realizes there is something more to the Count and the goal turns to saving Mina from the blood sucking vampire.

The film techniques witnessed in these two pieces reflect similarities. Both are heavily shadowed and relatively dark to reflect a mysterious and ominous mood. The style of this technique helped to define and place Nosferatu within the German expressionist and Weimar cinema movements. Not only was the Gothic horror genre created with the rise of German expressionism, films within the movement touched on topics of a post war society and did so with low budget sets and technology.

The shadows play a huge role within the film for they make Orlok look far larger, more menacing, and terrifying; it shows the fear of impending doom. Much of the movie is incredibly dark, most scenes taking place at night, but the few scenes that are brighter show muted colors unless the focus is on blood or anything red. After all, vampires love blood.

Coppola uses similar quick cuts between scenes but also uses fading images and overlays. Towards the end of the film, Coppola also pays homage to the cinematograph when Mina and Prince Vlad are first introduced:.

A quick. In front of the moving picture, Dracula marvels at the wonders of science, and Mina responds that compared to Madame Curie picking up the light-within-darkness theme this is certainly not science. Do not be afraid of me Count Vlad because I love you and because I, too, like the oncoming Lumiere train, am only an image on film 6. Other than how they were filmed and what techniques were used to create certain moods and atmospheres, both pieces touch on social and political topics.

My first thought when comparing the two films side by side was how extremely pornographic Coppola made his adaptation. The three vampire wives of Count Dracula, during the scene in which Jonathan is seduced by them, are bare chested and convey a state of ecstasy.

Although she is engaged, she tantalizes every man she meets. The most visually sexualized moment of the film is at the bitter end after Ellen has been bitten, she is moving in such a way that suggests point of orgasm and ecstasy. The multitude of Dracula influenced films in the past century have portrayed Dracula and vampires as sexual beings but the earliest account is not so.

Movies and films based on books can go in all kinds of directions. Murnau was able to create his vision more successfully due to the introduction of Weimar cinema — darkness was acceptable and immortality was craved. With the leaps and bounds made in technology, Coppola was able to take the novel further while still respecting it by using techniques and ideas similar to early cinema.

Due to the fact that sexuality was more embraced, Coppola took female characters to the next level of sexuality and lust. Awesome analysis. The book of The Outsiders and the movie of The Outsiders had several things in common, but there were also things left out from one that was in the other.

The film is pretty faithful to the narrative in the book and even makes reference to the diaries, but there are a number of changes: The film starts with legend of Vlad the impaler which is not in the book.

Renfield is a lawyer who had been working on the property transaction before Harker. Character of Dracula is less threatening initially in the book than in the film, where the vampire explanation is more overt from the beginning. Dracula has a shadow that operates separately from his body movements in the film.

The carriage driver is not revealed as Dracula at any point. A retelling of the Bram Stoker 's horror novel, Dracula. A physical storytelling using artistic gravity acrobatics. Something I have never seen before makes you question what are some different types of theatre. It keeps you grounded in every word, movement, and song. Throughout the years, classic horror films have been adapted to modern days; moreover, vampires live forever, but they have evolved.

The classic scary, but intriguing vampires who prey on humans to drink their blood have now become likeable and attractive vampires who protect humans. The classic Dracula and the modern Edward Cullen will be compared based on their creation, personality, and their supernatural aspects. Edward Cullen and Dracula are creatures that are considered to be thrilling and exciting creations.

There are not as many similarities compared to differences as both stories are similar however, some parts have been changed. John Harker is given little to do throughout the film; even his romance with Mina feels like an afterthought at times. In Dracula , Van Helsing ends up being a more heroic character than Harker. Nosferatu wins here, since we actually follow the same hero from beginning to end of the movie, and he gets plenty to do, not to mention more outright development.

Winner: Nosferatu. The Supporting Cast Again, this differs substantially as a result of the difference between silents and talkies, and both casts have their strengths and weaknesses. Dracula has a terrific supporting cast, the most noteworthy of which being Dwight Frye as Renfield, the realtor turned deranged lunatic and playing both sides of the coin brilliantly and Edward Van Sloan as an aging Van Helsing, who believes in the vampire threat, and puts forth his utmost effort to stop Dracula.

These few key performances put Dracula a cut above Nosferatu in this regard. The Mood of the Film Both films have a menace that plays out in different ways, but there is no denying that said menace is real, and a threat to the characters at hand. In Dracula , turmoil is stirred up as a result of the paranoia that spreads throughout London as a result of Dracula attacking and killing his victims.

There is no clear winner here; both movies succeed equally well in their own ways. The Setting of the Story Dracula , though written in the s by Bram Stoker, is apparently set in a contemporary time period due to the appearance of modern amenities in London.

Nosferatu , on the other hand, is set in a small German village in the s. In the latter, heroes have no modern amenities; Hutter must even communicate with his wife via letters carried on horseback; no telephones or automobiles to speak of in Wisborg! Nosferatu wins here because its setting creates another challenge, albeit a less obvious one, for our heroes. The Pacing: In its current state, Dracula clocks in at around 75 minutes. This is short by modern standards, but the brisk pacing enables the story to move along while developing the plot and the characters as necessary.

Nosferatu is roughly minutes longer and does an equally good job of development of both story and personnel, but there are a few scenes, characters, and moments that do not feel overly integral to the overall plot, and probably could have been axed. The shorter and more concise Dracula wins here. The Setpieces Again, much of this stems from the nature of the source material. Conversely, Nosferatu has an entire village, more chambers and rooms to the haunted Transylvania castle, and many other interesting locales, interior and exterior alike.

The Body Count: For a vampire threat to be credible, said vampire has to leave a trail of corpses in his wake, and a few new vampires to be born. Count Orlok needs blood for sustenance, and does not create new vampires.

Despite his menace, he kills very few in his travels aside from the crew of the ship that takes him to Wisborg and it could be argued that their deaths are more plague-oriented than directly related to Orlok himself. In Dracula , the titular character has already created vampire wives back in Transylvania, and on his first night in London, wastes no time getting down to business.

The Ending: Murnau changed the ending of the original Dracula story as one of his stipulations to try to avoid legal repercussions, which unfortunately did not work for him; at least not from a legal standpoint.

The hero has lost his beloved, but her sacrifice ends the threat of the vampire, bringing peace to Wisborg. In Nosferatu , the ending is bittersweet, but a sacrifice had to be made for the victory, for the greater good. Who Would Win in a Fight?